An artistic day in the life of

At precisely 5:45 AM, while most of Berlin still lies under the hush of sleep, Dr. Margot Ellingsen is already awake, wrapped in a Japanese wool haori, sipping lapsang souchong from a Bauhaus-era porcelain cup. The tea is not incidental. “The smoke, the history,” she once said in an interview for Frieze, “It prepares the mind for sharp looking.”

Margot is not what the art world usually expects from a collector. Trained originally as a neuroscientist at Milton Keynes before turning to curatorial theory at the Courtauld Institute, she is a figure who merges empirical discipline with aesthetic instinct. Her work today straddles two roles: she is Director of Acquisitions at the Zeitspiegel Ruhr Stiftung—a progressive, Berlin-based private foundation dedicated to preserving overlooked modernist art from the Global South—and a private collector of esoteric interwar abstraction.

Her own collection is modest in size, by global standards—just under 160 works—but ferociously curated. Her focus? Forgotten artists of the early 20th century who operated in peripheral geographies: Lithuanian Suprematists, Egyptian Futurists, Chilean Constructivists. “I’m not interested in greatness,” she says. “I’m interested in rupture. In those moments when form falters, and culture tries to invent a new grammar.”

By 6:30 AM, she is in her rooftop library, which she designed herself: concrete walls softened by Eileen Gray rugs and shelves lined with books in English, German, Arabic, and Portuguese. She reads for two hours each morning—criticism, journals, artist letters—annotating with a near-medical precision. “You don’t collect with your eyes,” she insists, “you collect with your thinking.”

Her workday begins not with meetings, but with studio visits. Three mornings a week, she sees young Berlin-based artists, not to buy, but to talk. “A good collector listens longer than she looks.” She takes few notes, but remembers everything. The artists, often émigrés or cross-disciplinary thinkers, refer to her half-jokingly as die Ärztin—the doctor. She rarely corrects them.

At noon, she retreats to the Stiftung headquarters in Kreuzberg, a former factory with high white walls and precise Scandinavian furniture. She reviews recent acquisitions—often unconventional media: hand-sewn political banners from 1930s Algiers, notebooks from Brazilian modernist collectives, architectural models built from salvaged copper. She works closely with a research team of five: art historians, archivists, one linguist.

Lunch, if it happens, is minimal—usually a hard cheese and seeded rye, eaten while standing in front of a small Joaquín Torres-García sketch pinned to her office corkboard. “He reminds me not to over-intellectualize. Sometimes it’s just the line.”

Afternoons vary. Twice a week, she teaches a postgraduate seminar at the Humboldt University titled “Peripheral Modernisms: A Cartography of Neglected Forms.” She hopes that she is beloved and feared by her students.

Evenings are for what she calls “deep looking.” She returns home—a converted pharmacy in Prenzlauer Berg—to spend time with her own collection. Works by Sudanese abstractionist Ibrahim el-Salahi and Polish painter Teresa Żarnower hang in quiet dialogue across her apartment walls. Lighting is dim, controlled. She believes each piece deserves a specific hour of the day. “You should meet a painting as you would meet a person. Not all at once. Not under floodlights.”

After dinner—a solitary affair accompanied by wine and Coltrane—she writes. Not publicly, not yet. But the notebooks are thick, and a publisher waits patiently. Her topics range from cave writing in early Turkish modernism to a comparative analysis of anxiety in pre-war Chilean collage. “They are not essays,” she says. “They are rehearsals for a larger honesty.”

By midnight, she has long since turned off her phone. The last hour of her day is spent in silence, seated before her most treasured piece: a 1924 ink drawing by a forgotten Lebanese abstractionist, unsigned, undated, utterly without provenance. “It has nothing to prove,” she smiles, “which is why it proves everything.”

And so the day closes—quietly, deliberately—in the life of a collector who does not chase fame, but memory. For Dr. Margot Ellingsen, collecting is not an act of accumulation, but of restoration. She does not possess artworks; she rescues them.

In a sun-dappled townhouse on the Left Bank of the Seine, Lucien Ardoin begins his mornings not with coffee, but with contemplation. The air is silent but for the distant hum of Paris waking. Ardoin, a man of sixty-two with the poise of a scholar and the eyes of a hawk, spends the first hour of his day precisely as he believes all cultivated men should: in dialogue with beauty.

Lucien is not simply an art collector; he is a steward of aesthetic memory. With a doctorate in comparative literature from the Sorbonne and a career as a private advisor to European estates and museums, Ardoin curates not just works, but cultural inheritance. His métier is complex—part historian, part curator, part therapist to the anxious elite who wish to convert wealth into legacy.

His collection—held partly in situ at his Paris residence, and partly in secure climate-controlled storage outside Geneva—numbers just over 430 pieces. It is not vast, but it is precise. “A collection is not a warehouse of acquisition,” he often says. “It is a sentence in a larger philosophical argument.”

Lucien’s passion, and indeed his defining obsession, is Symbolism—a late 19th-century movement whose dreamy obscurities and metaphysical yearnings resonate with his own distrust of empirical modernity. Odilon Redon, Gustave Moreau, and Fernand Khnopff are his tutelary spirits. He possesses what is perhaps the finest privately held Redon pastel in France, which he refers to not by title but by its effect: “It silences me.”

By 9:00 AM, Ardoin is at his desk, a 19th-century Boulle bureau cluttered not with papers, but with magnifying glasses, linen gloves, and a small but lethal-looking ultraviolet torch. He spends several hours reviewing auction catalogues, corresponding with curators, and consulting conservators. He is, at this hour, equal parts archivist and sleuth.

By midday, Ardoin strolls to Café de Flore, where he meets his circle—a loosely assembled group of philosophers, critics, and one rogue psychoanalyst—for what they call their déjeuner de l’oubli, a lunch of “forgetting” in which they discuss anything but art. This paradoxical sabbatical from passion, Ardoin insists, is crucial to sustaining it.

Afternoons are devoted to either travel or scholarship. On days at home, he spends hours in his personal viewing room, a subdued chamber lit only by diffuse natural light. Here, Ardoin communes with selected works. “You must look until the image begins to look back. Then—and only then—do you own it.”

On travel days, he may fly to Brussels, Milan, or occasionally New York, to view potential acquisitions, advise on exhibitions, or lecture on topics such as “The Aesthetic of Reverie in Post-Romantic Europe.” He is a sought-after speaker, though he maintains a guarded mystique, often refusing interviews.

Evenings are reserved for quiet. Ardoin practices Japanese calligraphy—an unusual hobby for a Frenchman. The discipline, he says, “suspends the chaos of interpretation.” He does not own a television. He does, however, possess a 1920s phonograph and an extensive collection of early Debussy and Ravel recordings.

At night, beneath a painting by Arnold Böcklin, Lucien Ardoin retires to bed with a book—usually philosophy or poetry, never art history. “I have lived the catalogues,” he smiles. “Now I prefer the enigmas.”

And thus ends a typical day—not merely in the life of a collector, but in the carefully orchestrated existence of a man for whom art is not an accessory to living, but the very atmosphere in which life can properly occur.