“We Sing Because It Must Be Stopped”
Originally published in ArtSense International, July 2025 Edition
On a warm spring afternoon in downtown Truro, I am led through the back entrance of an unmarked rehearsal space behind a closed-down aquarium gift shop. Inside, seated under a suspended disco ball and surrounded by half-empty herbal tea mugs, is the elusive leader of the Guardians of Aesthetic Coherence—the protest collective whose off-key lullabies helped force the removal of Sandy Warre-Hole’s infamous triptych, Gause De Flim, from public display.
The leader, who gives their name only as “M,” is dressed in a navy tracksuit, latex gloves, and a tight black balaclava with hand-stitched gold trim.
What follows is a lightly edited transcript of our interview.
Q: You’ve been accused of being anti-art, anti-modernity, and in one editorial, “a karaoke death cult with pretensions of style.” How do you respond to that?
M:
We are not against art. We are against its misuse. We oppose aesthetic fraudulence, symbolic gluttony, and sonic excess posing as insight.
Q: Your protests have been called ‘weaponised off-key lullabies.’ Why lullabies? Why off-key?
M: Because lullabies should soothe. They are pure, minimal, emotionally direct. When rendered grotesque and tuneless, they disturb. That is the point. Our dissonance is discipline. Our disharmony is diagnostic.
Q: What, specifically, did you find so objectionable about Gause De Flim (Triptych of the Improbable)?
M: Everything. The iconographic inflation. The layered irony that eats itself. The theology of the meme. And above all: Gause De Flim. It was a fugue of meaninglessness. A taxidermy of the digital soul. A cathedral of confusion pretending to be human.
Q: But many argue that your daily protest turned into performance art itself. Did you, in some sense, complete the triptych?
M: We were not performing. We were existing. We purged. We cleansed. We sang what could not be said.
Q: What do you say to those who insist Warre-Hole’s work was genius? That it reflected the hybridized, fractured nature of contemporary identity?
M: Genius has become a synonym for indulgence. To reflect incoherence is not enough. We demand form. Proportion. Harmonic restraint.
Q: Will you protest again if the triptych is reinstated?
M: We are always listening. We dwell in the margin. We are the minor second in your safe space.
Q: If you could say one thing to Sandy Warre-Hole, what would it be?
M (removing one glove, pauses):
Sandy, if you must invent heroes, make them silent. If you must invent losers, let them whisper. Above all, allow them to hum out of tune.
As I leave, I hear M singing softly: an off-key lullaby that floats upward through the fluorescent-lit stairwell. Whether a protest, performance, or prayer, it stays with me for hours.
Editor’s Note: Since this interview, the Guardians of Aesthetic Coherence have begun a new project: disrupting AI poetry readings with rhythmic coughing. Their manifesto, Elegance, Elgar, or Else, is reportedly being readied for publication in Portugese.