Sandy Warre-Hole brings their witty portraits to Pimlico Wilde

Sandy Warre-Hole brings their witty portraits to Pimlico Wilde

Sandy reinvents the society portrait for a new generation, filling the canvas not just with the chap/chapess being immortalised, but also with the sort of joie de vivre that can only be found in places like St Tropez, Minorca or Rhyl.
“I love creating a likeness of celebrities. Ever since I painted the dog when I was three, (it took my mother hours to clean its fur), it has been my dream to earn a living as an artist. Now my work sells for prices that boggle the mind, which is a great reward for the years of poverty I endured as I learned my trade.”

Sandy currently lives between Calais and Dover. They love the sea and have a fully fitted artist’s studio on board a ferry which plies its trade across the Channel. “I love life on the open waves. The phone reception isn’t great, which I love. I can pretend I didn’t get any messages.”

Commissions by Sandy can take slightly longer than normal as it is hard to contact them.

Check out the artist’s CV here

Is an Old Painting Recently Found in Fulham by Michelangelo?

Is an Old Painting Recently Found in Fulham by Michelangelo?

Art World in Frenzy

A recently unearthed painting found wedged behind a fuse box in the basement of a terraced house in Fulham has sparked feverish speculation in art circles, with some daring to ask: could this be an unknown work by Michelangelo himself?

The small oil painting, measuring approximately 40cm x 30cm, depicts a muscular figure reclining against what appears to be a cracked column, gazing mournfully at a bowl of overripe pears. The canvas was discovered during renovation works by homeowner Olivia Trent, who had originally planned to convert the basement into a Pilates studio.

Speculation exploded after a local antiques dealer posted an image of the painting on social media with the caption “Lost Michelangelo?” Within hours, self-declared art sleuths descended on Fulham, clutching UV lights and waving around copies of The Lives of the Artists like sacred scrolls.

Dr. Lionel Corbusier of the South Kensington Institute for Unverified Masterpieces believes the composition bears “an undeniable emotional weight, an echo of the Sistine Chapel’s Adam, if Adam had slightly longer hair and a more questionable understanding of perspective.” He adds, “There’s a majesty in the brushwork, albeit hidden under thick layers of dust, but it could be an early work by the master.”

Even more tantalising: carbon dating of the wood panel places its origin in the early 16th century. And a faint, nearly illegible signature in the bottom corner reads either “Michel Angelo” or “Michael Andrews”.

However, not everyone is convinced.

“This is not by Michelangelo. It’s not even by Michelangelo’s dog walker’s cousin’s apprentice,” said Gloria Haversham, curator of Early Renaissance Art at the Royal Hove and Borough Museum. “It looks like a schoolboy’s art project on a hot Friday afternoon,probably after his mum told him he couldn’t go to the park until he finished something for class.”

She added, “The anatomy is questionable, the shading is confused, and I’m fairly certain that the bruise on the left wrist is actually a poorly rendered digital watch.”

Despite the scepticism, the painting,already nicknamed The Fulham David,will go on display at a pop-up exhibition in a converted newsagent off North End Road. Tickets are £44.50 or free with proof of recent pasta purchase from the adjoining Italian deli.

Whether it’s the lost work of a Renaissance master or the artistic tantrum of a Year 9 student, one thing is clear: the Fulham painting has already earned a place in the pantheon of delightful art world mysteries…

Book Review: Grandma Rode a Lizard into Town by Jorvik Parn

One does not pick up a novel titled Grandma Rode a Lizard into Town expecting restraint. And Jorvik Parn,performance artist, multilingual cough drop salesman, and occasional sculptor of edible furniture,delivers exactly what the title promises. With this riotously strange and oddly poignant debut novel, Parn proves that literary fiction can be both conceptually daring and gloriously, unapologetically absurd.

The eponymous Grandma,whose real name, we are told, is “Lorna Widdershins”,rides into the dusty desert town of Hatwater, Arizona astride an iguana named Barry, trailing a cloud of cactus pollen. She claims to have arrived in search of the Thoughtful Thorn, a legendary succulent believed to flower only once every presidential impeachment. But her arrival sets off a sequence of events involving migratory watchmakers, and a local bakery that communicates exclusively in Morse code.

Narrating this sunbaked saga is Dr. Linus Ogle, a disgraced ethnobotanist-turned-hatmaker, who’s attempting to write a definitive taxonomy of Italian headgear. What begins as a documentary project soon devolves into something halfway between an existential awakening and a highly conceptual scavenger hunt. The story’s structure,if one can call it that,is a patchwork of desert diary entries, annotated botanical etchings, and excerpts from The Hatwater Codex, an unreliable manuscript said to have been dictated by a drunken cowboy during a terrible sandstorm.

Parn’s prose is glorious and of the highest order, oscillating between the lyrical and the downright lunatic. Here, for instance, is how Ogle describes a moment of spiritual vertigo: “The wind smelled of forgotten jams”. A perfect sentence.

Though Parn is often compared to Pippy Schell and Sally O’Brien, there’s something uniquely tactile about her imagination. Every page is steeped in texture, textile, terrain and temperament. The town of Hatwater is drawn in surreal but loving detail: its silent hat parades, its broken laundromat, its local economy powered almost entirely by barflies and barbers.

What holds the novel together,barely, but beautifully,is its earnest heart. Beneath the dust, scales, and millinery chaos is a story about the language of grief, the elasticity of family, and the strange comforts of miscommunication. Grandma’s journey, we come to learn, is not just botanical or symbolic, but deeply personal. She’s trying to bloom in a world that’s forgotten how to water anything but its own assumptions.

Readers who crave plot will be deeply confused. Those who demand linearity may run for the hills. But readers willing to surrender to Parn’s hallucinatory logic will be rewarded with a novel that is not just read but inhabited.

Grandma Rode a Lizard into Town is, ultimately, a book about the things we carry: our baggage, our bruises, our hats. Jorvik Parn has written a debut that defies categorisation. It doesn’t care if you like it. It dares you to keep up,and somehow, through all the surrealism and silliness, it makes you feel deeply seen.

New series- A Day in the Life Of: Lucien Ardoin, Art Collector

In a sun-dappled townhouse on the Left Bank of the Seine, Lucien Ardoin begins his mornings not with coffee, but with contemplation. The air is silent but for the distant hum of Paris waking. Ardoin, a man of sixty-two with the poise of a scholar and the eyes of a hawk, spends the first hour of his day precisely as he believes all cultivated men should: in dialogue with beauty.

Lucien is not simply an art collector; he is a steward of aesthetic memory. With a doctorate in comparative literature from the Sorbonne and a career as a private advisor to European estates and museums, Ardoin curates not just works, but cultural inheritance. His métier is complex,part historian, part curator, part therapist to the anxious elite who wish to convert wealth into legacy.

His collection,held partly in situ at his Paris residence, and partly in secure climate-controlled storage outside Geneva,numbers just over 430 pieces. It is not vast, but it is precise. “A collection is not a warehouse of acquisition,” he often says. “It is a sentence in a larger philosophical argument.”

Lucien’s passion, and indeed his defining obsession, is Symbolism,a late 19th-century movement whose dreamy obscurities and metaphysical yearnings resonate with his own distrust of empirical modernity. Odilon Redon, Gustave Moreau, and Fernand Khnopff are his tutelary spirits. He possesses what is perhaps the finest privately held Redon pastel in France, which he refers to not by title but by its effect: “It silences me.”

By 9:00 AM, Ardoin is at his desk, a 19th-century Boulle bureau cluttered not with papers, but with magnifying glasses, linen gloves, and a small but lethal-looking ultraviolet torch. He spends several hours reviewing auction catalogues, corresponding with curators, and consulting conservators. He is, at this hour, equal parts archivist and sleuth.

By midday, Ardoin strolls to Café de Flore, where he meets his circle,a loosely assembled group of philosophers, critics, and one rogue psychoanalyst,for what they call their déjeuner de l’oubli, a lunch of “forgetting” in which they discuss anything but art. This paradoxical sabbatical from passion, Ardoin insists, is crucial to sustaining it.

Afternoons are devoted to either travel or scholarship. On days at home, he spends hours in his personal viewing room, a subdued chamber lit only by diffuse natural light. Here, Ardoin communes with selected works. “You must look until the image begins to look back. Then,and only then,do you own it.”

On travel days, he may fly to Brussels, Milan, or occasionally New York, to view potential acquisitions, advise on exhibitions, or lecture on topics such as “The Aesthetic of Reverie in Post-Romantic Europe.” He is a sought-after speaker, though he maintains a guarded mystique, often refusing interviews.

Evenings are reserved for quiet. Ardoin practices Japanese calligraphy,an unusual hobby for a Frenchman. The discipline, he says, “suspends the chaos of interpretation.” He does not own a television. He does, however, possess a 1920s phonograph and an extensive collection of early Debussy and Ravel recordings.

At night, beneath a painting by Arnold Böcklin, Lucien Ardoin retires to bed with a book,usually philosophy or poetry, never art history. “I have lived the catalogues,” he smiles. “Now I prefer the enigmas.”

And thus ends a typical day,not merely in the life of a collector, but in the carefully orchestrated existence of a man for whom art is not an accessory to living, but the very atmosphere in which life can properly occur.

Artist Boz flies across Monaco harbour in self-made hot-air balloon

In what critics are calling “equal parts daring and delirious,” London‑based multimedia artist Boz today piloted a self‑fashioned hot‑air balloon across the glittering expanse of Monaco Harbour. The impromptu aerial exhibition, dubbed La Traversée de l’Absurd, drew crowds of astonished onlookers both on the quayside and aboard luxury yachts.

Witnesses report that the balloon,crafted from repurposed gallery banners, discarded IKEA curtains, and duct tape,ascended from a secluded dock near the Yacht Club de Monaco shortly after dawn. “It looked like a giant, patchwork lampshade with an attitude problem,” quipped bystander Marie‑Claire Dupont, clutching her morning espresso.

Boz, whose previous works include a life‑sized replica of Nelson’s Column made entirely from stale baguettes, described the voyage as “a soaring metaphor for artistic freedom,and a cheeky jab at overpriced tour‑boat tickets.” In a pre‑flight statement posted on their Instagram Stories, the artist promised “views, ventriloquism, and maybe a minor diplomatic incident.”

The flight itself was punctuated by spontaneous performance elements: midway across the harbour, Boz unfurled a banner reading “Art Isn’t Grounded” and released dozens of biodegradable confetti hearts into the breeze.

After a leisurely five‑minute drift, the craft touched down neatly on a floating platform used for berthing jet skis. Onlookers cheered as Boz disembarked, bowing deeply while cradling a burned‑orange sketchbook. “It’s not every day you see someone redefine the term ‘air mail’,” remarked one astonished tourist.

Having survived the event, Boz plans to auction off fragments of the balloon’s fabric, with proceeds going to his pet dog.

Stay tuned for an exclusive gallery showing this Friday at London’s Neon Loft, where attendees can view charred scraps of curtain, hand‑drawn flight logs, and an installation featuring the ticket stub for the car-park where he parked his Lamborghini during the flight.

The Mayfair Book Groupette & The Bibliophiles of Belgravia: Joint Meeting

Date: 22rd April 2025

Time: 7:15 PM , 11:40 PM

Location: The Upper Library, The Royal Travellers and Explorers Club, Pall Mall

Attendees:

Mayfair Book Groupette:

• Julian Molyneux (Chair, Pimlico Wilde)

• Fiona d’Abernon (Co-Founder; Acting Secretary)

• Lord E. Northcote

• Dr. Xanthe Lorrimer (Cultural Historian)

• Hugo Van Steyn

• India Trelawney (Fashion Archivist)

• Conrad Smithe (now granted full membership)

• Pascal (Afghan hound, in discreet charcoal wool coat)

Bibliophiles of Belgravia:

• Lady Hortense Blyth (President)

• Giles Ashcroft-Symonds (Archivist)

• Clarissa Montjoy (Rare Book Dealer)

• Edward “Ned” Parmenter (Critic-at-Large)

• Dr. Basil Uxley (Retired Museum Director)

• Mrs. Cecily Thorndon (Private Collector)

Book Discussed:

Voynich Illuminata: The Herbal Codex as Surrealist Object by Dr. Mireille Artois (limited edition, self-published, 2024, print run of 150 copies, hand-bound in nettle fibre with marbled endpapers).

The Club staff had laid out original pages of the Voynich manuscript on velvet-covered trestles for inspection prior to discussion.

1. Welcome & Context

Lady Hortense opened proceedings by welcoming members of the Mayfair Book Groupette and hoping that they would have an enjoyable evening. Turning to the evening’s study, she noted that Voynich Illuminata “exists somewhere between scholarship and dreamwork,” and warned against “falling into the trap of treating the Voynich Manuscript as a puzzle rather than a mirror.”

Molyneux added that Dr. Artois’s thesis,namely, that the manuscript should be read as a proto-Surrealist artefact,was “provocative and more plausible than one might expect from that drunkard”. He was asked immediately to apologise, which he did. Lady Hortense said that the Belgravia Bibliophiles had certain standards that she hoped the Mayfair Book Groupette would attempt to satisfy. Fiona d’Abernon looked like she was about to riposte, but she bit her tongue.

2. Discussion Summary

Dr. Lorrimer praised Artois’s interweaving of Surrealist theory with medieval herbal iconography, though she questioned the leap from alchemical diagrams to “intentional proto-automatism.”

Clarissa Montjoy enthused about the book’s physical form, especially the lithographic misalignment which she felt “evoked uncertainty.” She passed around one delicate page, advising members to note the unusual smell of the nettle fibre papier.

Lord Northcote admired the “cheek” of placing the Voynich among the Surrealists, but cautioned that “the true pleasure lies in not knowing,” likening the manuscript to “a king’s addiction,everyone suspects, no one confirms.”

Hugo Van Steyn invoked Max Ernst’s Histoire Naturelle, claiming the Voynich’s plant-forms anticipate Ernst’s frottage techniques. He mused whether the manuscript could be read as “an proto-artist’s book,” drawing an arch look from Dr. Uxley.

Mrs. Thorndon expressed scepticism about Artois’s chapter on lunar calendrics, calling it “a poetic indulgence, not evidence.” She admitted, however, that the chapter on “phantasmic botany” had caused her to dream of blue thistles for a week.

Ned Parmenter was the most combative, suggesting the book was “art-world conspiracy theory for the bibliophilic set.” He was met with gentle but audible scoffing from both groups.

3. Artworks & Ephemera on View

• Three large-format photographic prints of Voynich folios by artist Samira Kelmar, overpainted in egg tempera and gold leaf

• A 1936 issue of Minotaure featuring Surrealist interpretations of herbal forms, on loan from Lady Hortense

• A herbarium of fictitious plants by contemporary artist Elodie Varn, pressed and mounted in vellum sheets

• A glass dome containing a small, spiralled root labelled “Unknown, c.1420,?,” provenance unverified

4. Refreshments

• Aperitif: elderflower-and-vermouth spritz with sprigs of rosemary

• Canapés: wild mushroom tartlets, anchovy-leaf crisps, nettle gougères

• Main wine: Château d’Yquem 2005 (donated by Van Steyn, to audible gasps)

• Dessert: pistachio and cardamom semifreddo served with candied angelica stems

5. Other Business

• Proposal for a Voynich Illuminata field trip to the Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library in New Haven, pending logistical feasibility.

• Bibliophiles of Belgravia extended an invitation to the Mayfair Groupette for a January meeting on The Codex Seraphinianus.

• Molyneux floated the idea of commissioning a limited artist’s book inspired by the evening, to be co-published by both groups in 2026.

6. Adjournment

Meeting concluded at 11:40 PM, after a spirited but unresolved debate over whether the Voynich bathers were “ritual participants” or “early performance artists.” Several members lingered to compare the texture of nettle fibre bindings under lamplight.

Fiona d’Abernon

Acting Secretary

Joint Mayfair Book Groupette / Bibliophiles of Belgravia Meeting

Why Isn’t Otto Vallin More Famous?

The Invisible Architect of Modernism

In the increasingly crowded pantheon of early modernist pioneers,Picasso, Braque, Kandinsky, Mondrian,it seems inconceivable that one of the most formative, least derivative figures remains largely unknown outside the footnotes of specialist monographs and the occasional dusty retrospective catalogue. That figure is Otto Vallin (1878,1953), the Swedish polymath whose ideas were not merely ahead of his time but, in many cases, quietly gave birth to the time itself.

The question, then, is not whether Vallin was important (he was), or original (profoundly), or influential (unwittingly, perhaps more than anyone). The question is: Why isn’t Otto Vallin more famous?

A Peripheral Centre

Born in Malmö in 1878 to a typographer and an amateur astronomer, Vallin’s earliest visual experiments were conducted with the lenses of his father’s telescopes and the galleys of his mother’s typeset proofs. By the age of 19, he was already producing what he called “conceptual reductions”: collages of geometric forms constrained to primary colours and strict orthogonal lines,works he dismissed as “drafts” but which prefigure the aesthetic of Dutch Neoplasticism by over a decade.

It was Vallin, we must remember, who is reputed to have remarked to a young Piet Mondrian, while examining one of his early works: “Very nice, Piet. But why not just use red, blue, and yellow?”

By the time Vallin relocated to Paris in 1907, he had already published On the Simultaneity of Forms, a modest self-printed treatise in which he proposed that “a painting should be less like a window and more like a map of seeing”,a passage often cited as a proto-cubist credo. According to several letters now held at the Bibliothèque Kandinsky, Vallin visited Picasso’s studio in the Bateau-Lavoir and, after examining an early iteration of Les Demoiselles d’Avignon, remarked: “I think it would be better if you painted it from lots of different viewpoints at once.”

The Trouble with Otto

If Vallin was so prescient,so central to modernism’s birth,why does he remain so obscure?

Part of the answer lies in temperament. Vallin was constitutionally allergic to what he called “the theatre of self.” He refused to exhibit in salons, detested the commercial gallery system, and rarely signed his works. In his own words, “an artist’s ego should be an unseen scaffold,not the building.” His distaste for self-promotion would prove fatal to his legacy.

Moreover, Vallin was chronically dislocated from the centres of fame. Though he passed through Paris, Munich, and Vienna, he never stayed long. He spent much of the 1920s in Tartu, Estonia, where he taught at the university and painted prolifically in private. During the war years, he returned to Sweden and lived in a lighthouse cottage in Skåne, producing increasingly minimalist drawings,what one curator described as “Mondrian, but with even fewer colours.”

And unlike his more famous contemporaries, Vallin never attached himself to a movement. He was neither a Cubist nor a Constructivist; neither Futurist nor Dadaist. He prefigured them all, and outlived many,but was absorbed by none.

Recognition Posthumous

It is only in recent decades that scholars have begun to reassemble the fragments of Vallin’s legacy. The 1997 exhibition Otto Vallin: The Man Who Wasn’t There at the Moderna Museet in Stockholm marked the first serious effort to reclaim his place in history. More recently, his 1905 painting Reduction No. 4,a strict grid of blue and red squares on a yellow ground,has been re-evaluated as a forerunner not only to Mondrian but also to conceptual minimalism. Critics now speak of a “Vallinian” ethos: art as distilled cognition, rather than representation.

Still, his name remains unfamiliar outside academic circles. He has no movement. No manifesto. No scandal. Only the quiet echo of ideas that shaped the 20th century without demanding credit.

The Shadow in the Frame

It is perhaps fitting that Otto Vallin’s obscurity mirrors the very principle he most prized: that art should illuminate, not dominate. He was the scaffolding. The map, not the monument. In a world where influence is often measured by visibility, Vallin’s absence was his final, paradoxical contribution.

Without Otto Vallin, would modernism have happened?

Book Review: My Toenails Are Ideograms by Plover C. Glint

It is a rare pleasure,indeed, a great privilege,to encounter a novel that is so well written as this startling and singular debut from the award-winning Plover C. Glint. She is of course the conceptual painter whose previous claim to fame involved a solo show of weather-reactive canvases that changed hue with barometric pressure. Glint’s novel, much like her artwork, seems animated by a conviction that language itself is both an aesthetic medium and an unruly deity.

To answer the inevitable question: no, My Toenails Are Ideograms is not about podiatry, per se. The title,plucked from a line uttered by the book’s elusive protagonist, Dr. Hesper Ving,is emblematic of Glint’s entire approach: playful, opaque, and steeped in a kind of ecstatic misdirection. The plot (a term used here with gentle flexibility) revolves around Ving, a former semiotician turned subterranean gardener, whose toenails begin to grow in geometric patterns that closely resemble extinct logographic scripts. As word of her condition spreads, Ving finds herself alternately pursued by linguists, wellness influencers, and a splinter sect of Neo-Gnostic calligraphers.

It sounds preposterous, but Glint executes the conceit with such intellectual bravado and painterly delicacy that disbelief dissolves. The novel is constructed in fragments: diary entries, annotated glossaries, synesthetic footnotes, and transcripts of interviews conducted by a German podiatrist, translated into sign language. The result is a text that reads as though Borges had been fed a steady diet of fermented turmeric and left alone in a stationery shop.

What distinguishes Toenails from mere postmodern pastiche, however, is Glint’s abiding attention to the sensory texture of language. Her prose is lush, tactile, often vertiginous. A particularly memorable passage describes a dream in which Ving’s feet sprout alphabetic plumage and lift her into the sky:

“Each toe unfurled like a vellum scroll, the symbols inked in lapis and milk. The wind turned my ankles into punctuation. I hovered somewhere between an ampersand and a sigh.”

Glint, one suspects, sees writing not just as communication but as choreography,a dance between symbol and sensation. Her visual training is apparent not just in the vividness of imagery, but in her spatial sense of narrative structure. The novel resists linearity, opting instead for a kaleidoscopic accumulation of motifs: avian grammar, fungal etymologies, the erotic potential of ligatures.

And yet, amid all the conceptual mischief, there is emotional gravity. Ving’s journey,strange as it is,functions as an allegory of bodily estrangement and linguistic exile. Her toenails become a site of both wonder and alienation: a part of her that speaks in a voice she cannot fully understand. Beneath the novel’s cryptic surface lies a meditation on what it means to live in a body that betrays, translates, and transforms.

My Toenails Are Ideograms will no doubt divide readers. For some, it will prove impenetrable, its digressions maddening, its humour too barbed or baroque. But for others,those who find joy in the cryptic, who believe literature should sometimes behave like an installation piece or a fever dream,it will feel like home.

Plover C. Glint has written an unusually profound book: absurd, intricate, and oddly luminous. One suspects it won’t be the last time we hear from her.

Doodle Pip – Portrait of a friend

In Portrait of a Friend, Doodle Pip continues their irreverent and compelling project of anti-resemblance. Known for their defiantly unfaithful sketch portraits, Doodle Pip treats likeness not as a goal but as a threat. The sitter here – a friend of the artist – is reimagined as a chaotic abstraction of borrowed features, spontaneous lines, and visual non-sequiturs. Eyes may appear too far apart, a nose might resemble a musical note, and mouths float with intentional misalignment. The result is strangely intimate: not a representation of how someone looks, but perhaps how they don’t,and, by inversion, who they are.

For Doodle Pip, recognition is a failure. Their success lies in capturing something more elusive: the unplaceable feeling of a person’s presence without resorting to facial fidelity. Each work is a small rebellion against the tradition of portraiture as documentation. Instead, they offer a new genre,portraits of intention, energy, and delightful misdirection.

Portrait of a Friend exemplifies Pip’s approach at its most refined: gestural, loose, and utterly unrecognizable.