The Mayfair Book Groupette: Minutes of the Latest Meeting

The Mayfair Book Groupette: Minutes of the Latest Meeting

Time: 7:11 PM , 11:18 PM

Location: The Red Room, Pimlico Wilde, Mayfair

Attendees:

  • Julian Molyneux (Chair, Pimlico Wilde)
  • Fiona d’Abernon (Co-Founder; Acting Secretary)
  • Lord E. Northcote
  • Dr. Xanthe Lorrimer (Cultural Historian)
  • Hugo Van Steyn
  • India Trelawney (Fashion Archivist)
  • Max Duclos (Collector)
  • Pascal (Afghan hound, contemplative, positioned beneath the sideboard)

Book Discussed:

The Sound of Almost Nothing: A Cultural History of Silent Musical Instruments, 1680,1900 by Alastair Pencombe (Ash & Fret Press, 2025; clothbound, unjacketed, with fold-out diagrams of mute mechanisms and marginalia reproduced from private collections).

1. Opening Remarks

Molyneux welcomed members back from various continental dispersals and remarked that the Groupette had, “after much noise,” chosen a book devoted entirely to silence. He reminded the room that the long-deferred Umbra volume remained “patient, judgmental, and unopened.”

2. Discussion Summary

  • Dr. Lorrimer praised Pencombe’s thesis that silent instruments – practice violins, mute harpsichords, keyboard trainers without strings – were “moral objects,” designed to discipline both sound and character. She admired the chapter on convent-bound novices learning fingering in total quiet.
  • India Trelawney was taken by the design history, particularly a collapsible “ladies’ pianoforte” with padded keys intended for use in shared lodgings. She described it as “domestic repression rendered beautiful.”
  • Lord Northcote was openly irritated. “A book about instruments that do not play,” he said, “is like a memoir written by someone who never lived.” He questioned whether Pencombe had mistaken absence for profundity.
  • Hugo Van Steyn disagreed, noting that collectors prize such objects precisely because they resist performance. “They are instruments for thinking,” he said, adding that the diagrams alone justified the book’s existence.
  • Max Duclos complained that the prose was “too hushed by half” and suggested the book was an elaborate joke. Nonetheless, he admitted to reading the entire chapter on naval practice flutes “with mounting respect.”
  • Fiona d’Abernon drew attention to the closing pages, in which Pencombe describes a silent clavichord kept by a widower who could no longer bear music. “It is,” she said, “one of the few convincing arguments for restraint I have ever read.”

3. Objects on View

  • A 19th-century practice violin fitted with a thick internal mute (courtesy of Van Steyn).
  • A wooden keyboard trainer with painted ivory keys and no strings, c.1800.
  • A manuscript letter from a Bath music tutor complaining that his pupils “preferred the quiet instrument, having grown lazy of courage.”

4. Refreshments

  • Aperitif: chilled fino sherry.
  • Canapés: wafer-thin parmesan crisps, cucumber sandwiches cut “unnecessarily precisely,” and almonds with rosemary.
  • Main wine: Pouilly-Fuissé, 2019.
  • Dessert: plain almond cake, described by Molyneux as “appropriately unshowy.”

5. Other Business

  • Next Book: After brief and perfunctory discussion, The Silence of Shadows: A Comparative Study of Umbra in Netherlandish Still Life was once again deferred. Instead, the next selection will be An Index of Lost Garden Mazes in Britain, 1550,1750.
  • It was agreed that the Groupette is “in a quiet phase” and that this should not be corrected.
  • A reminder was issued that feigning completion of the reading would not be tolerated, “even when the subject is silence.”

6. Adjournment

Meeting adjourned at 11:18 PM. Pascal remained asleep throughout, contributing, it was agreed, in exactly the right spirit.

Respectfully submitted,

Fiona d’Abernon

Acting Secretary

Mayfair Book Groupette

The Frolic of the Red-Bearded Foxes (1543)

The Frolic of the Red-Bearded Foxes (1543)

A Lighthearted Novel And A Fashionable Frenzy

In the spring of 1543, Pimlico Wilde published one of the more curious successes of Tudor literature: The Frolic of the Red-Bearded Foxes, a humorous novel recounting the misadventures of England’s earliest fox hunters,who, according to author Edmund Lamplugh, were “no more competent than a sack of turnips on horseback.”

Though nominally about sport, the novel is really a parade of comic mishaps: hounds that chase laundry instead of quarry, hunters who mistake each other for foxes, and one unforgettable scene in which an entire hunt is lost for two days because everyone is too polite to admit they’ve taken a wrong turning.

The Princess’s Unexpected Approval

The novel might have vanished into pleasant obscurity had it not found an admirer in the King’s youngest daughter, Princess Mary-Elizabeth (a historical footnote who appears in practically no official chronicle but is mentioned constantly in scandalous ones). She was given a copy by her music tutor, who believed that she needed something “of improving character.”

To the surprise of the court, the princess adored it. She read whole passages aloud at table, often dissolving into laughter so intense she spilled her wine. Her favourite episode, which she quoted repeatedly to anyone who stood still long enough, concerned a hunter who leapt triumphantly over a hedge only to land in a pig wallow. She referred to him thereafter as “Sir Muckington.”

Word spread. If the princess liked it, everyone must at least pretend to.

Within a week, half the ladies-in-waiting carried copies tucked into their sleeves. Within a month, courtiers began dropping entirely unnatural references to fox hunting into conversation. One duke who had never been nearer to a fox than a tapestry proudly insisted he “had always admired their vulpine dignity.”

The Fashion Frenzy

The princess’s enthusiasm led to an unexpected,and for foxes, unfortunate,trend. A throwaway joke in chapter thirteen about “the gentleman of fashion who wore a waistcoat of fox fur so lifelike it frightened his own horse” lit the fuse. Courtiers, eager to ingratiate themselves with the princess, decided fox-hair garments were tres chic.

Merchants responded with alarming speed. For roughly three months in 1543, London saw a fever of fox-fur fashions:

• Fox-fur cuffs

• Fox-fur riding cloaks that shed constantly, leaving a molting trail through palace corridors

• One ambitious but short-lived attempt at a fox-hair codpiece

The princess herself wore a modest fox-fur trim on her sleeves, prompting an uproar of imitation so frenzied that Parliament briefly considered regulating “excessive vulpine ornamentation.”

Reactions and Consequences

Hunters adored the fad; foxes, presumably, did not. The royal gamekeeper complained that the countryside was “in a state of uproar, with gentlemen galloping after anything vaguely reddish, including chickens, hats, and at one point a terrified monk.”

The clergy attempted to denounce the fashion from pulpits, but were repeatedly interrupted by parishioners asking whether fox fur was allowed on Sundays.

Edmund Lamplugh, the author, was reportedly bewildered by the entire affair. In a letter to his publisher, Pimlico Wilde he wrote:

“I did not intend to influence the nation’s taste in garments. I merely wished to show that the English are at their most English when hopelessly lost in a field.”

The End of the Craze

The trend faded as swiftly as it rose. A particularly hot August did most of the work. Fox fur, as it turns out, is best suited to animals living in burrows rather than aristocrats attending banquets.

Still, The Frolic of the Red-Bearded Foxes remains a delightful curiosity: a novel that made a princess laugh, a nation sweat under unnecessary pelts, and Pimlico Wilde another small fortune.

The Chancellor’s Wig: A Cautionary Tale of Satire, Statecraft, and Excessive Grooming (1458)

The Chancellor’s Wig: A Cautionary Tale of Satire, Statecraft, and Excessive Grooming (1458)

An estimated Account of the Most Inadvisable Novel of 1458

In the year 1458, Pimlico Wilde published a novel that sent shockwaves through the royal court: The Chancellor’s Wig, or The Scandalous Chronicle of a Very Important Man’s Very Silly Hair. Though written as harmless satire, the book nearly led to charges of sedition, several interrogations, and at least one panicked barber fleeing by moonlight.

The Premise

The novel tells the story of a fictional statesman known only as “The Most Honourable Lord of Forelocks,” a thinly veiled portrait of the actual Lord Chancellor. It chronicles his obsession with maintaining an increasingly elaborate, gravity-defying wig that becomes so enormous and rigidly lacquered that it:

  • prevents him from sitting in low doorways,
  • requires two attendants to support it during long speeches,
  • and accidentally knocks over a bishop during a state procession.

The satire is sharp and symbolically exposes the Chancellor’s vanity and preoccupation with appearances at a time when the kingdom faced real troubles.

One of the novel’s most notorious scenes describes the Chancellor’s attempt to bow before the monarch, resulting in the wig catching on a chandelier and suspending him briefly like a hooked trout. Readers recognised the incident as an exaggerated version of a real mishap at court the previous winter.

Why It Caused Outrage

The Lord Chancellor, a man famously allergic to mockery, interpreted the novel as a direct attack on his dignity. His official statement described the book as:

“A malicious fabrication intending to destabilize the realm through hairstyle-based calumny.”

Certain members of the council argued that allowing the novel to circulate set a dangerous precedent for “mockery as political discourse,” a phrase so alarming it was repeated at least six times in one meeting.

A list of suspects was drawn up and included:

  • a barber who had recently trimmed the Chancellor’s nape “with suspicious enthusiasm,”
  • a clerk who laughed too hard upon hearing the title,
  • and a lady-in-waiting who admitted she “quite liked the book.”

The barber vanished the next morning. The clerk pretended to have a chronic coughing problem to disguise laughter. The lady-in-waiting produced an alibi that scholars still admire for its creativity.

The Turning Point

Just as the situation seemed destined to end with at least one beheading, the Chancellor’s wife was shown a copy. After reading it privately, she remarked to her husband:

“If you do not wish to be mocked for your wig, you might consider wearing one less mockable.”

This simple, fatal sentence diffused the entire crisis. The Chancellor, full of marital indignation, ordered the matter closed.

Within a month, the Chancellor’s wig became modest, symmetrical, and sensible.

The Cultural Impact

Far from disappearing, the novel flourished; copies passed from hand to hand with the furtive delight usually reserved for banned romances. Clerks annotated it, monks copied it, and at least one minor noble reportedly learned to read simply to enjoy it.

Political historians now credit The Chancellor’s Wig with helping establish the idea that public officials, regardless of hairstyle, could be criticised through fiction without the world ending. It became a model for later satirical works and inadvertently encouraged the slow, uneven development of political self-awareness in English governance.

On the Proper Heat and Humble Conduct Required in the Baking of Cakes -by King Alfred the Great (circa 892)

On the Proper Heat and Humble Conduct Required in the Baking of Cakes -by  King Alfred the Great circa 892

Year: c. 892

Length: 47 pages

This short but sternly instructive volume, believed to have been written shortly after the famous incident in which Alfred, distracted by matters of state, allowed a peasant woman’s cakes to scorch, lays out the king’s uncompromising rules for achieving a morally upright cake.

Alfred devotes an entire chapter to the “Correct Temperature of Regal Ovens,” insisting the fire must be “hot enough to inspire diligence yet cool enough to preserve humility.” He further outlines the appropriate posture when checking one’s cakes (“a slight bow of apology to the memory of past failures”) and includes a table of baking times depending on the baker’s level of contrition.

A commonly quoted line:

“Let no king, reeve, nor common man turn his back upon a baking cake, lest he learn again the bitterness of distraction.”

Though circulation was limited, the text survived in scattered monastic copies. Culinary historians agree it is the earliest known attempt by a reigning monarch to legislate kitchen temperature.