Comment

New Work: Just Full (Central London) by Ngua

by
Bins of the world - the ambitious photo project by contemporary artist Oboe Ngua

On the exciting occasion of a new Ngua photograph, Theorina Blank writes about the Theology of Refuse.

There it stands,Ngua’s latest offering to the canon of contemporary urban observation: Just Full (Central London, 2025). The work, deceptively simple, presents a standard dual-compartment recycling and general waste bin positioned before a Nike billboard, its commanding injunction,“JUST DO IT”,fractured by the bin’s quiet rebuttal. The bin, through Ngua’s lens, has already done it. It is, quite literally, full.

What at first appears an act of documentary photography soon unfurls into an essay on the metaphysics of modern exhaustion. The bin is not merely a vessel for refuse,it is a vessel for us. Its overstuffed lids sag gently beneath the weight of a civilisation that has, one might say, recycled too much meaning and thrown away too little vanity.

Critics have already likened Just Full to Ruscha’s Standard Station and Jeff Wall’s After “Invisible Man” by Ralph Ellison, but such comparisons miss Ngua’s quieter insurgency. Where Wall staged, Ngua witnesses. Where Ruscha fetishised the industrial, Ngua canonises the municipal. Her composition is a hymn to infrastructure, an ode to the city’s forgotten organs,the bins, signs, bollards, and lamp posts that hold the metropolis upright while its citizens scroll obliviously past.

Note the exquisite compositional tension: to the rear, consumer aspiration shouts in glossy magenta capitals,JUST DO IT!,while the bin, small but stoic, delivers the urban counter-sermon: JUST DID IT. The human presence is peripheral, ghostly,a driver half-glimpsed in a white car, a van mid-pause, the suggestion of endless motion, all orbiting this fixed black cube of civic endurance.

There is something liturgical about Ngua’s framing. The bin occupies the exact midpoint of the frame, as if seated upon a modest throne. The street’s grey paving slabs spread before it like a nave. Even the iron post to the left resembles a confessional column. Ngua’s London is a secular cathedral, and the bin its reliquary,cradling the relics of takeaways, crushed cans, and a civilisation’s too disposable dreams.

In interviews, Ngua has been maddeningly evasive. When asked whether the juxtaposition with Nike’s slogan was intentional, she merely replied, “The bin was there.” When pressed on the overflowing waste, she added, “So are we.”

It is this laconic defiance that defines her work. She neither condemns nor glorifies. She simply reveals the city’s pulse through its most abject artefacts. In her world, waste is no longer the end of consumption but its spiritual residue,the ghost in the machine of capitalism, humming quietly under an LED billboard.

Just Full (Central London, 2025) is, then, less a photograph than an existential diagram. It situates us between the imperative of desire and the inevitability of decay. It is the portrait of an era that can no longer distinguish between throwing away and worshipping.

Ngua, ever serene, has once again photographed not the bin, but us,all of us, teetering on the rim, about to overflow.

This piece will subsequently appear in Aesthetica Brutalis the best-selling art magazine in Southern Beirut.

The Politics of the Umbrella by Alaric Montjoy

by
The Politics of the Umbrella by Alaric Montjoy

An umbrella is never just an umbrella. It is a prop, a weapon, a symbol, a declaration of intent. To carry one is to signal preparedness; to forget one is to accept the possibility of chaos. Somewhere between the functional and the theatrical, umbrellas tell us far more about ourselves than we like to admit.

Consider, first, the umbrella as social signifier. The neat black brolly, furled with military precision, is the preserve of City bankers and government officials,Edward Heath’s Cabinet looked like an army of dark, dripping bats. Contrast this with the floral collapsible umbrella bought in desperation from a train station kiosk, flimsy and half-broken before the rain has even stopped. One declares permanence, the other resignation.

Umbrellas, too, are political. In Hong Kong, the 2014 Umbrella Movement transformed an everyday object into a symbol of resistance, its canopy shielding protesters not from rain but from tear gas. In Britain, Neville Chamberlain’s ever-present umbrella became shorthand for appeasement,so much so that Hitler reportedly mocked him for it. (One wonders what Chamberlain might have accomplished with a leather jacket and sunglasses.)

Writers have understood this duality. Charles Dickens filled his novels with umbrella-wielding clerks and parsons, as if the object itself were shorthand for middle-class propriety. In Virginia Woolf’s diaries, the umbrella is less prop than nuisance, constantly forgotten or misplaced,another reminder of her restless modernity. And who can forget the surreal image of Magritte’s Hegel’s Holiday, in which an umbrella shelters a glass of water, absurdly logical and logically absurd?

Then there is the choreography of umbrellas. Watch a crowded London pavement on a rainy afternoon and you will see a ballet of avoidance, the subtle tilting and ducking as strangers negotiate canopy-space. The umbrella, like the fan in 18th-century Spain, comes with its own unspoken code of gestures. A sharp flick to shake off raindrops can be an act of aggression; the sharing of an umbrella, meanwhile, remains one of the most intimate acts of urban life.

I confess that I myself own far too many umbrellas: a vast golf umbrella emblazoned with a Japanese whisky brand (impossible to carry without looking faintly ridiculous), a tartan one bought in Edinburgh out of sheer cliché, and a slim Italian number whose handle is carved like a greyhound’s head. Each one, I realise, corresponds to a different version of myself,banker, tourist, flâneur.

What fascinates me most is how the umbrella collapses the boundaries between the private and the public. It is a mobile roof, a personal architecture, yet one that constantly intrudes upon others. To open an umbrella in a crowded space is to declare territory. To close it, dripping, is to rejoin the crowd.

Perhaps, then, the umbrella is best understood not as an accessory but as a metaphor: a reminder that culture itself is a kind of shelter, a canopy beneath which we huddle together, trying not to get drenched by the weather of history.