Following our review in which “Saltwind” was well-received, Jane Temple wanted to discuss her very different view of Erdenko’s work. She writes…
There are artistic provocations, and then there is Saltwind. Sofia Erdenko’s new “album”,though that term feels ludicrously inadequate for what is essentially seventy-eight minutes of groaning, scraping, and grinding,presents itself as an epochal leap beyond the cello’s historical lineage. In truth, it is less an advance than a deliberate retreat into the void, an exercise in self-important austerity that mistakes endurance for profundity.
The cello has, for centuries, been a vessel for human expressivity. From Bach’s serene architecture to Shostakovich’s wrenching laments, the instrument has spoken with depth, gravitas, and clarity. Erdenko, however, seems intent on silencing this heritage by weaponizing the cello against itself. What remains is not music but a catalogue of abrasions: bow hair sawing sul ponticello until it produces nothing but static; pizzicato so slack it resembles a collapsing clothesline; overpressure groans that might be mistaken for industrial plumbing.
Her defenders will no doubt invoke Cage, Xenakis, or Lachenmann as antecedents, arguing that Erdenko continues their radical project of expanding the vocabulary of sound. Yet where those figures discovered new possibilities,new sonorities, new forms of expression,Erdenko offers only negation. This is not expansion but contraction, a refusal to engage with the very premise of music-making. To reduce the cello to little more than a wind machine or a sheet of creaking timber is not radical; it is simply tedious.
The recording’s intimacy, celebrated by admirers as forensic fidelity, only magnifies the problem. We are placed so close to the instrument that every scrape and groan is not transcendent but suffocating. What is intended as ritualistic austerity too often resembles a rehearsal tape, the kind of sonic detritus musicians normally discard.
It is tempting, in a highbrow age that rewards opacity with prestige, to cloak such work in grand metaphors: the death of tradition, the archaeology of sound, the ritual of endurance. Yet one suspects the simpler truth is that Saltwind offers little to endure but tedium. It is music as an ordeal, designed less to be heard than to be admired at a theoretical distance, the way one might admire an especially barren installation in a gallery.
None of this is to deny Erdenko’s seriousness of intent. But seriousness alone is not enough. In the end, Saltwind stands as an object lesson in the perils of avant-gardism untethered from expression: it demands our patience, but offers nothing in return. The abyss, it turns out, sounds a lot like someone tuning their cello for an hour and never quite beginning to play.
