Between Floors: The Elevator Art of Jonas Richter

Between Floors: The Elevator Art of Jonas Richter

Most art is made for walls, some for floors, others for entire landscapes. Jonas Richter, however, has claimed a stranger territory: the elevator. For more than a decade, the German-born artist has exhibited exclusively inside elevators, transforming the transitional space between floors into a site for art, ritual, and encounter.

“I am interested in pauses,” Richter explains. “Moments when people are suspended, neither here nor there. The elevator is the perfect theatre for that.”

A Moving Gallery

Richter’s exhibitions take many forms: a series of miniature paintings hung just above the floor buttons, an audio installation playing through the elevator’s tinny speaker, or sculptural objects tucked into the corner where people usually place grocery bags. Sometimes he simply alters the lighting or mirror to shift perception.

One of his earliest works, Fifth Floor, Please (2012), consisted of a sound piece of whispered voices that seemed to come from within the elevator walls, murmuring numbers, floor names, and fragments of overheard conversations. Passengers found themselves caught between intrigue and unease as the doors closed behind them.

Why Elevators?

For Richter, the elevator is not just a quirky location, but an essential medium. “It’s the most democratic space,” he says. “Everyone uses them,office workers, hotel guests, cleaners, executives. You don’t choose to enter an elevator gallery. The gallery finds you.”

He compares it to the intimacy of cinema, where strangers share a small, dark space. But unlike a movie theater, the elevator demands brevity. “I have maybe 20 seconds to show you something before the doors open. That urgency excites me.”

Unseen Audiences

Because his work appears in elevators without formal announcements, Richter’s audiences are often accidental. In one project, Up/Down (2016), he lined the interior of a hospital lift with photographs of staircases spiraling endlessly upward. Visitors later reported feeling disoriented, even dizzy, by the strange doubling of vertical movement.

Elevator staff sometimes remove his interventions, but Richter embraces the ephemerality. “I don’t need permanence,” he says. “The point is the encounter. Maybe someone rides between floors once, sees something strange, and never forgets it. That’s enough.”

Performances in Transit

Beyond objects and images, Richter also stages performances in elevators. In Lifted (2019), two dancers silently rode an office building’s elevator for an entire day, moving in slow synchrony each time the doors opened. Passengers stepped into the space and suddenly found themselves inside a performance,part participant, part audience.

“It was about turning the elevator into a stage,” he explains. “The everyday ride became charged, like stepping into a secret world for just a few floors.”

Reception and Recognition

Though Richter’s practice resists the traditional gallery system, his reputation has grown. Critics describe him as “the artist of in-between spaces,” and his projects have been supported by institutions who loan him elevators for temporary installations. In 2023, he staged a city-wide project in Berlin, installing 15 different works across public elevators in shopping centers, libraries, and train stations.

Still, Richter remains adamant: he will never exhibit in a conventional gallery. “Elevators are my canvas. They’re awkward, transitional, overlooked. That’s what makes them beautiful.”

Jonas Richter has redefined the way we think about art and space, turning one of the most mundane of human experiences,the elevator ride,into an arena for imagination and reflection. For a few seconds, between floors, passengers are no longer simply in transit. They are part of a fleeting, secret gallery that rises and falls, endlessly repeating, as long as the doors continue to open and close.

What Holds Us Up: The Exposed Furniture of Clara Jensen

What Holds Us Up: The Exposed Furniture of Clara Jensen

Walking into a gallery of Clara Jensen’s work feels like stepping into a dissection room. Familiar armchairs sit beneath bright lights, but their upholstery has been carefully sliced open. Springs protrude like ribs. Padding hangs in tufts like torn muscle. Frames, once hidden, jut out like bones. These are not broken objects, they are sculptures, laid bare by an artist intent on revealing what comfort conceals.

Jensen, a Danish conceptual artist, has gained recognition for transforming furniture into raw metaphors for the body. Her practice is rooted in one simple act: peeling. By cutting, flaying, and exposing the structures inside sofas and chairs, she turns everyday objects into haunting meditations on fragility, trust, and the unseen.

“Furniture is intimate,” Jensen explains. “It holds us, it supports us, and yet we almost never think about its insides. I want to show what we rely on without ever seeing.”

From Design Student to Disruptor

Jensen began her career as a furniture design student in Copenhagen, studying the principles of balance, ergonomics, and form. But she quickly became frustrated with the field’s obsession with sleek surfaces and flawless finishes.

“I felt suffocated by perfection,” she recalls. “All the invisible work was hidden under upholstery, under polish. I wanted to tear it open.”

Her first “flayed” chair emerged during her final year of study: a classic Danish armchair, carefully sliced along the seams. Viewers were shocked not only by the violence of the gesture but by the strange tenderness it revealed. Beneath the clean lines and smooth fabric lay something messy, fragile, and surprisingly human.

Anatomy Lessons in Comfort

In many ways, Jensen’s work reads like anatomy. Springs resemble veins, wood frames mimic skeletons, and layers of foam call to mind fat and muscle. By exposing these hidden systems, she asks viewers to think differently about both the objects and themselves.

“Just as we trust our bodies to hold us up without ever seeing our bones, we trust furniture,” she says. “I want people to question that trust, not to lose it, but to understand it.”

Her installations often heighten this association. In one exhibition, she arranged a series of gutted sofas on stainless steel tables, as if in a morgue. In another, gallery lighting was replaced with surgical lamps, so the viewer felt complicit in the act of exposure.

Violence or Care?

While some critics describe her work as violent, Jensen resists the label. “It’s not destruction, it’s uncovering,” she insists. “To open something is not to kill it. It is to know it more deeply.”

Indeed, there is a strange tenderness in the way she re-stitches seams after cutting them, or how she props up exposed springs so they don’t collapse entirely. She refers to her process as “excavation” rather than deconstruction, suggesting a respect for the craftsmanship buried inside.

The Body in the Room

Perhaps the most unsettling aspect of Jensen’s work is the way it implicates the viewer’s own body. Standing before an opened chair, it’s impossible not to think of skin, organs, and bone. Sitting on one of her pieces, something she occasionally invites in controlled performances, feels precarious, even intimate.

“You feel the springs shift under you,” says one visitor. “It’s like sitting inside someone else’s body.”

Jensen sees this discomfort as essential. “We live surrounded by surfaces that reassure us, smooth walls, polished tables, upholstered chairs. But we are fragile, stitched together just like these objects. I want to put the fragility back into the room.”

Reception and Legacy

Jensen’s work has been exhibited across Europe, often in both design and fine art contexts, where it unsettles the boundaries between the two. Collectors sometimes request pieces for their homes, but she insists they remain in the gallery. “They aren’t furniture anymore,” she says. “They are questions.”

Her upcoming series, Holding Patterns, will expose not only the interiors of chairs but also reinforce them with translucent resin, freezing their fragile systems in a state of permanent vulnerability.

By cutting open sofas and armchairs, Clara Jensen reveals more than just stuffing and springs. She exposes our reliance on the unseen, our trust in hidden systems, and our own uneasy relationship with fragility. Her work is not about comfort, but about what lies beneath it, and the unsettling knowledge that, like furniture, we too are stitched, padded, and held together by structures we rarely see.

Folding the Unfoldable: The Furniture Sculptures of Yumi Hasegawa

Folding the Unfoldable: The Furniture Sculptures of Yumi Hasegawa

At first glance, Yumi Hasegawa’s sculptures look like something out of a dream. Dining chairs curve into arcs as fluid as brushstrokes. Coffee tables fold delicately, their edges crossing like the wings of paper cranes. Stools stretch and twist until they resemble dancers caught mid-turn. It’s only when you approach more closely that you realize: these impossibly light forms are not made of paper, but wood.

Hasegawa, a Japanese sculptor based in Kyoto, has built an international reputation for transforming wooden furniture into what she calls “functional origami.” Using a combination of traditional steam-bending and contemporary woodworking techniques, she reshapes everyday furniture into fluid, folded forms that look too graceful to be real.

“I wanted to teach stiff wood how to move,” Hasegawa says, describing her practice with a gentle laugh. “Furniture has always been seen as fixed, obedient. But I see it as a material waiting to dance.”

From Architecture to Sculpture

Hasegawa trained as an architect before shifting to sculpture. Her early work dealt with modular structures, but she found herself increasingly fascinated by the lines of furniture,particularly chairs. “Architecture is big, monumental. A chair is small, intimate. But both are about holding the body,” she explains. “I realized a chair could tell the same story as a building, only closer to the skin.”

Her breakthrough came in 2015 when she exhibited a piece titled Folded Chair No. 1 at the Kyoto Municipal Museum of Art. The work looked like an ordinary wooden dining chair until you noticed its backrest: instead of standing upright, it bent forward in a graceful arc, as though bowing. Viewers described it as both humorous and strangely poignant, an object acknowledging the people who would sit upon it.

The Craft of Bending Wood

The process behind Hasegawa’s pieces is laborious. She begins with ordinary furniture,often mass-produced pieces from thrift shops,and then subjects them to a combination of steam, pressure, and cutting. Wooden slats are heated until pliable, then coaxed into unexpected curves. The artist often describes this as a negotiation rather than a command.

“Wood doesn’t like to fold the way paper does,” she says. “Every piece has its own grain, its own stubbornness. I never know exactly where it will give way. I bend a little, wait, bend again. It’s like a conversation.”

The resulting sculptures balance fragility with resilience. Some resemble folded fans, others seem to twist like ribbons. In one striking series, a row of identical chairs has been bent into increasingly exaggerated poses, as if caught in a slow-motion sequence of gymnastics.

Furniture as Performance

Though sculptural, Hasegawa insists her works are still furniture. “I don’t want to strip them of their identity,” she says. “They are chairs and tables, just… transformed.” Many remain technically usable, though often in impractical ways: a folded chair might hold you, but you sit at a precarious tilt; a bent table still supports a teacup, though only at a single corner.

In exhibitions, Hasegawa sometimes invites visitors to sit on her works, turning the gallery into an experimental tea room. The act of sitting becomes performative, a negotiation between comfort and instability. “You become part of the fold,” she explains.

Cultural Roots and Inspirations

Hasegawa’s work draws deeply from Japanese aesthetics. She cites origami as an obvious influence, but also ma,the Japanese concept of negative space and intervals. “When I fold a chair, I am not only shaping wood, I am shaping the empty spaces around it. A fold is both material and air.”

She also acknowledges the influence of traditional crafts such as bamboo weaving, where strength emerges through tension and flexibility. “I want furniture to feel alive in the same way a woven basket does,” she says.

The Reception and Beyond

Collectors and museums have taken keen interest in Hasegawa’s work, and her pieces are now part of design collections in Tokyo, London, and New York. Critics praise her ability to “retrain the eye”,to make us see something as ordinary as a chair with fresh wonder.

Yet Hasegawa herself seems less concerned with fame than with continuing her experiments. She is currently working on a series of folding benches inspired by origami animals, each one suggesting the curve of a crane’s wing or the bend of a koi fish.

“I don’t want to make furniture more beautiful,” she says thoughtfully. “I want to make it more surprising. When you see a chair bow, or a table fold, you realize the world is less fixed than you thought. Even wood can learn to move.”

In Hasegawa’s hands, furniture is no longer heavy, or immobile. It becomes pliant, poetic,caught between utility and impossibility. Her sculptures remind us that the most familiar objects can still astonish, if only we learn to bend our assumptions.

Brewing Art: Five Artists Who Turn Coffee into Creativity

Brewing Art: Five Artists Who Turn Coffee into Creativity

For some, coffee is more than a morning ritual,it’s a medium and a pigment. These five contemporary artists have embraced coffee in their practice, transforming everyday beans into compelling works of art.

1. Elena Vazquez , Coffee Watercolorist

Mexican artist Elena Vazquez uses brewed coffee as her primary pigment, painting delicate landscapes and portraits in warm sepia tones. The natural staining properties of coffee give her pieces an organic, ephemeral quality: each work subtly changes over time, reflecting the fleeting nature of both art and aroma. Vazquez often titles her paintings after specific coffee blends, linking flavour with visual experience.

2. Marco DiSanto , Espresso Ink Calligrapher

Italian calligrapher Marco DiSanto swaps traditional ink for espresso, creating flowing scripts and typographic designs that smell as much as they spell. DiSanto’s work is particularly known for large-scale installations where entire walls are covered in coffee-calligraphy, transforming gallery spaces into both visual and olfactory experiences. Visitors report the scent as “an unspoken part of the message.”

3. Amina Farouk , Coffee Stain Abstracts

Egyptian artist Amina Farouk embraces the randomness of coffee spills. Using mugs, drips, and puddles, she creates abstract compositions that balance chaos and precision. Farouk views coffee as a metaphor for chance, ritual, and human imperfection. She often layers brewed coffee over gold leaf or textured paper, producing rich, tactile contrasts that draw viewers in for a closer look.

4. Jasper Lin , Sculpting with Coffee Grounds

Singaporean artist Jasper Lin transforms spent coffee grounds into sculptural forms. By mixing them with resin and other binding agents, he creates small, dense sculptures with a unique texture and aroma. Lin’s works range from miniature animal figures to abstract geometric shapes, exploring themes of consumption, waste, and transformation. His studio famously smells “like a 24hr coffee shop at dawn,” adding a sensory layer to the creative process.

5. Sofia Moreno , Coffee Performance Artist

Colombian-born Sofia Moreno stages immersive performances using coffee as her medium. In one notable work, she poured gallons of brewed coffee over a blank canvas in rhythm with live music, letting the liquid pool, stain, and drip in real-time. Audience members sometimes participate, leaving handprints in the coffee. Moreno’s work blurs the line between ritual, social interaction, and art-making, using coffee to engage multiple senses simultaneously.

From painting to calligraphy, sculpture to performance, these five artists prove that coffee is more than a drink,it’s a versatile and evocative artistic medium. Their work invites us to pause, smell, and see, reminding us that creativity, like coffee, is best savored slowly.

Five Artists Who See the World Through a Giraffe Lens

Five Artists Who See the World Through a Giraffe Lens

Giraffes have long inspired curiosity, awe, and whimsy. Their towering elegance and curious eyes make them a favourite subject for artists seeking to explore nature and identity. Here are five contemporary artists who have made giraffes central to their work.

1. Lila Moreno , Painter

Mexican artist Lila Moreno reimagines the giraffe as a symbol of human resilience. In her large-scale acrylic paintings, she blends giraffe silhouettes with abstracted urban landscapes, stretching their long necks over rooftops, lampposts, and telephone wires. Moreno’s work is celebrated for its dreamlike tension: the giraffes are both out of place and perfectly at home, bridging the natural and constructed worlds.

2. Theo Johnson , The Giraffe Man

Theo Johnson, known in performance circles as “The Giraffe Man,” dons a meticulously crafted giraffe costume for public art interventions. Johnson’s performances range from slow, meandering walks through city streets to choreographed interactions with passersby, encouraging people to reconsider personal space, perspective, and the absurdity of human routines. Johnson likes describing his work as “a way to stretch empathy to new heights,literally.”

3. Keiko Tanaka , Sculptor of Giraffe Shadows

Japanese sculptor Keiko Tanaka works almost exclusively with steel and light. Her giraffe-inspired installations are deceptively minimal: thin steel rods, carefully angled, cast shadows that only reveal the full giraffe form when sunlight hits just right. Tanaka’s pieces are meditative, inviting viewers to notice the fleeting beauty of form, perception, and light.

4. Rashid Al-Salim , Giraffe in Motion Photography

In the deserts of the Middle East, Rashid Al-Salim has captured giraffes in motion in ways that highlight rhythm, pattern, and movement. Using high-speed photography and intentional blurring, he transforms these elegant creatures into surreal streaks of color and pattern across the sandy landscape. His work has been described as “jazzaffe photography,” where the giraffe’s natural grace meets improvisational abstraction.

5. Camille Rousseau , Giraffe-Inspired Fashion

French designer Camille Rousseau has built a couture line around giraffe motifs,not merely prints, but shapes, textures, and proportions. Flowing dresses mimic a giraffe’s neck, oversized collars evoke spots, and elongated silhouettes challenge traditional body proportions. Rousseau’s collections are a playful critique of fashion norms while celebrating the giraffe as an icon of elegance, quirkiness, and individuality.

From painterly abstractions to wearable tributes, these five artists demonstrate that giraffes are more than just zoo animals,they are muses, metaphors, and provocateurs.

The Absolute Disclosure of Liora Vey: Art as Relentless Truth-Telling

The Absolute Disclosure of Liora Vey: Art as Relentless Truth-Telling

In a time when much of contemporary art appears veiled in irony, coded aesthetics, or self-protective distance, the practice of Liora Vey (b. 1984, Antwerp) cuts through with a disarming,and often deeply unsettling,directness. Vey’s work is not visual in any traditional sense; it is the act of saying everything she thinks, unfiltered, no matter the situation. The medium is language, but the form is closer to performance, to intervention, to lived experiment. What emerges is both a singular body of work and a mirror that reflects the instability, absurdity, and madness latent in us all.

The Practice of Disclosure

Vey’s “performances” occur without announcement. At an exhibition opening, she might murmur aloud: “Everyone here is pretending to understand this painting, but they are mostly waiting for the wine.” At a hospital bedside, she has been documented saying: “You are afraid you are dying, but what frightens me is that I will one day sit here too.” In the middle of a residency interview panel, she once announced: “I want the grant, but I also want you to know that I resent needing your approval.”

Every setting becomes a stage; every thought becomes uttered material. Unlike scripted performance, these disclosures are improvised and inescapably real. Vey’s art is not about building a world, but about tearing down the buffers we usually maintain between thought and speech. The audience, if we can even call them that, is implicated,sometimes complicit, sometimes horrified, often laughing nervously.

Historical Echoes

Vey’s practice can be traced through a lineage of radical honesty in art. One hears faint echoes of Diogenes the Cynic, who defied convention by doing in public what others would conceal. In the 20th century, Vey’s brutal transparency recalls the confessional literature of Sylvia Plath or the raw psychoanalytic performances of Marina Abramović, yet Vey goes further: there is no frame, no “time for art” versus “time for life.” The piece is ongoing, indistinguishable from living.

If the Situationists sought to collapse the boundary between art and everyday life, Vey collapses the boundary between thought and speech. If Fluxus artists embraced chance operations, she embraces the uncontrollable slipstream of cognition itself.

The Madness in Us All

To listen to Vey is to encounter not just her mind, but the mechanism of thought we all share,desires, pettiness, cruelty, love, shame. She exposes the psychic “noise” we suppress in order to remain social beings. In doing so, she reminds us that sanity itself is performative, a consensus held together by restraint.

Critics have accused her of cruelty, of violating the private sphere. Yet Vey insists: “I am not cruel. I am only transparent. The cruelty is already there, inside us.” The discomfort is not generated by her words, but by their resonance with our own hidden interior monologues.

A Radical Continuation

Liora Vey’s project is one of uncompromising fidelity to thought itself. In an era of branding, self-editing, and algorithmic curation, her refusal to filter may be the most radical gesture available. Like the Dadaists mocking reason, or Bas Jan Ader embracing the tragic vulnerability of falling, Vey embodies the unpresentable truth of human contradiction.

Her art is not a call for everyone to “speak their mind,” but a revelation of what it means if we did: a world where love confesses jealousy, where admiration reveals contempt, where mourning admits relief. It is a reminder that beneath our carefully wrought performances of self, there is a cacophony waiting to break through.